Supply Chain

London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Rules in Yapı Merkezi's Favor

Author: Sedat Onat
Yapı Merkezi construction site — the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) ruled in favor of the Turkish contractor, ordering Ethiopia Railways Corporation to pay damages exceeding $300 million
London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Rules in Yapı Merkezi's Favor
0:00
0:00

Yapı Merkezi, one of Türkiye's most prominent construction firms, has built its reputation in Africa over recent years on large infrastructure programs. One of the firm's most important projects was in Ethiopia: in 2012, Yapı Merkezi won — with a $1.7 billion bid — a project to build a 400-kilometer railway line linking central Ethiopia with its north and onward to the strategic Port of Djibouti. Civil disturbances caused the contractor major damages and forced it to withdraw. The Turkish company applied to the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) to recover hundreds of millions of dollars in losses; in response, the Ethiopian government filed a $1.6 billion counterclaim.

That arbitration has now concluded. The London Court of International Arbitration ruled in the case Yapı Merkezi İnşaat brought against Ethiopia Railways Corporation (ERC) and ordered compensation of the Turkish contractor's losses. Damages exceeding $300 million are expected to be paid to the Turkish company. Yapı Merkezi Board Member Emre Aykar said the ruling was issued, although the payment-process decision had not yet been finalized. He added: "We are a company that operates in difficult geographies. With 60 years of experience we now work in challenging environments like Africa and take on the continent's most important projects. Turkish contracting companies continue to deliver successful work in the region. We plant our flag. Ethiopia was one such geography. Unfortunately, when civil war broke out, our project and our equipment were damaged."

The London tribunal accepted a substantial portion of the Turkish contractor's damage claims and appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) as the quantum expert. While Ethiopia's scenario priced the compensation at $230-300 million, the elapsed time has pushed the amount well above $300 million. The payment plan is expected to be finalized by end of May. The railway project as designed would have run roughly 400 kilometers, connecting central Ethiopia through Awash, Kombolcha to the northern Tigray region and via Hara Gebeya onward to access the Port of Djibouti.

From a supply chain and international construction-logistics perspective, the ruling matters in three dimensions. First, political risk management: Ethiopia's civil war (the 2020-2022 Tigray conflict) directly damaged the Turkish contractor's site equipment and facilities; the LCIA verdict creates a precedent in favor of Turkish contractors in force majeure and government-driven condition-change disputes. Second, the structure of the payment guarantee: Settling $300 million from Ethiopia's public budget by end-May is challenging — the payment plan may well be restructured around international finance institutions (World Bank, AfDB). Third, the Djibouti corridor: the failure to complete the 400 km railway raised Ethiopia's cost of sea access; the existing Chinese-built Ethiopia-Djibouti Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) — the only active rail link — runs on limited capacity. Completing the project would have plugged a strategic gap in Ethiopia's landlocked supply chain.


Key Takeaways:
1. London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) ruled in favor of Yapı Merkezi in its case against Ethiopia Railways Corporation (ERC).
2. Damages exceeding $300 million are expected to be paid to the Turkish contractor; Ethiopia's scenario was $230-300 million, but elapsed time pushes the amount significantly above $300 million.
3. The court appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) as quantum expert; the payment plan is expected to be finalized by the end of May.
4. Project: a 400 km railway line connecting central Ethiopia with the north and the Port of Djibouti; Yapı Merkezi suffered major damages and withdrew due to the civil war.
5. Ethiopia's $1.6 billion counterclaim failed; the ruling sets a precedent for Turkish contractors in force majeure and government-driven condition-change disputes.