Logistics

740-Metre Trains Have Shown Themselves to Be Surprisingly Divisive

Author: Sedat Onat
Freight train representative image
740-Metre Trains Have Shown Themselves to Be Surprisingly Divisive
0:00
0:00

RailFreight.com previously published an opinion piece taking a rarely heard perspective. The piece argued against the urgency of 740-metre trains in Europe. However, when RailFreight.com and the original author Borys Ganaylyuk collected audience responses, the result was far from unanimous. The exchange revealed deep divisions within the sector on the topic.

The EU's TEN-T policy aims to make 740-metre freight trains standard on main corridors. Longer trains are seen as critical for operators to boost efficiency figures by increasing capacity per train. However, on some lines, platform extensions, tunnel rebuilds, and signalling upgrades are highly expensive.

Supporters of Ganaylyuk's argument maintained that investments in existing infrastructure would deliver marginal benefits on lower-traffic lines. Those opposed argued that 740-metre trains are indispensable for easing congestion on the existing network and meeting modal-shift targets (road to rail) on priority corridors. The debate is becoming a benchmark for the EU Commission's corridor implementation plans.


Key Takeaways:
1. RailFreight.com's piece questioning the urgency of 740-metre trains in Europe drew divisive reactions.
2. Original author Borys Ganaylyuk found that the responses he collected were far from unanimous.
3. EU TEN-T policy aims to make 740-metre trains standard on main corridors.
4. Platform extensions, tunnel rebuilds, and signalling upgrades are expensive.
5. Supporters view longer trains as indispensable for easing congestion and modal shift.