Logistics

Propane Group Criticizes California's Internal Combustion Forklift Ban

Propane Group Criticizes California's Internal Combustion Forklift Ban

Sedat Onat
Propane Group Criticizes California's Internal Combustion Forklift Ban

California's Air Resources Board (CARB) is preparing to vote on June 27 on a policy that would mandate the replacement of internal combustion forklifts with battery-electric versions across the state. The policy covers approximately 100,000 forklifts, particularly those used in warehouses, distribution centers, and ports. 

\n


\n

CARB characterizes the transition to zero-emission technologies as a critical component of its strategy to reduce air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. However, the Western Propane Gas Association (WPGA) is opposing the policy, arguing that the transition will be more costly than expected. 

\n


\n

According to an economic impact report prepared by the WPGA, the regulation could cost forklift owners and operators in California up to 27 billion dollars. The group submitted a petition carrying approximately 800 signatures expressing serious concerns that CARB's decision would result in negative consequences across the state.

\n


\n


\n
Key Points
\n
    \n
  1. CARB is planning to replace internal combustion forklifts with battery-electric models.

  2. \n
  3. The WPGA claims that this transition will be very costly and not feasible.

  4. \n
  5. According to the WPGA's report, the regulation could result in costs of up to 27 billion dollars.

  6. \n
  7. The petition expresses concern that CARB's decision would create negative impacts across the state.

  8. \n
  9. Charging infrastructure for electric forklifts does not exist, and the replacement technology is expensive.

  10. \n
  11. It is noted that the actual number of forklifts is 220,000, rather than the 95,000 projected by CARB.

  12. \n
\n


\n


\n

News Link: https://www.thescxchange.com/articles/10339-propane-group-criticizes-california-plan-to-ban-internal-combustion-forklifts

Comments