Gemini's "Reliability Surcharge" Sparks Debate: Shippers Divided
Gemini's "Reliability Surcharge" Sparks Debate: Shippers Divided
Gemini Cooperation, formed by Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd, has attracted market attention through its strong on-time delivery performance in 2025. According to Sea-Intelligence data, Gemini achieved 89.1% on-time reliability across all arrivals in September, positioning itself as one of the sector's most consistent networks.
This success has prompted the two carriers to consider charging a premium for reliability. However, this proposal has triggered a clear divide among shippers.
Gemini: "You're removing 1–2 weeks of inventory from the supply chain"
Gemini executives emphasize at conferences that reliability is now a genuine "cost-saving line item."
The argument:
More predictable sailings,
Less safety stock requirements,
Lower warehouse costs,
Less excess inventory,
Shorter cash conversion cycle.
Some major shippers agree with this view:
"If I'm holding two weeks less inventory, that translates to more savings numerically than the ocean freight itself."
But not all shippers see it that way
BCOs at the ShiftX conference in Hamburg split into two camps:
1) Those opposed to premium charges
This group raises the following objections:
"Ships still route around Cape of Good Hope; transit times are already long."
"Reliability depends more on schedule adherence than ship routing."
"If they want premium pricing, the network must operate at full capacity with Suez open."
"Ensuring reliability is already the carrier's responsibility — additional charges cannot be justified."
Additionally, some shippers point out that they still experience feeder connection issues and transhipment delays even when ships arrive on time.
2) Those warming to the premium
Shippers in this camp argue:
inventory costs are rising,
they want less variability in supply chains,
schedule reliability directly impacts product availability.
One BCO's comment stands out:
"89% reliability is worth its weight in gold in this market. If they guarantee it, a premium makes sense."
Gemini's argument: "Reliability reduces costs"
According to Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd, the Gemini partnership:
streamlined connections through a centralized hub-and-spoke model,
reduced the risk of domino effects (downstream delays) from late arrivals,
delivered higher utilization, fewer delays, and more balanced service.
For these reasons, they argue that "high reliability" should command premium pricing.
The real issue: Shippers demand guarantees
The main objection from those skeptical of premium charges:
"No guarantee, no premium payment."
"If there's an SLA like 89% → 94%, then we can talk."
"If you're charging a premium, refund mechanisms must apply if delays occur."
At a time when shipping traffic remains volatile and the Suez is closed, a "reliability surcharge" is viewed by many BCOs as premature and risky.
Market impact: Will the premium model spread?
If Gemini implements this pricing:
other major carriers may adopt the "pay for reliability" model,
supply chains may begin purchasing high SLA levels as a "premium product,"
but divisions among BCOs could deepen.
Given the perception of "collapsed reliability" seen in container shipping over the past 15 years, premium charges carry both opportunity and risk.
Key Takeaways:
Gemini achieved 89.1% on-time arrivals in September, placing it among industry leaders.
Maersk & Hapag-Lloyd are considering premium pricing for high reliability.
BCOs are split: "We'll pay" vs. "It's already their job, why should we?".
Shippers are reluctant to pay premiums without guarantee mechanisms.
If the premium model takes hold, similar practices may emerge across the market.
----------
News Link: https://www.joc.com/article/shippers-split-as-gemini-floats-premium-charge-on-reliability-6118881
--------------------
Author: SedatOnat.com
--------------------
!!! ANNOUNCEMENT !!!
How to Implement ERP? Our book is now published on Google Play Books.
#What is ERP?
https://www.sedatonat.com/erpnasilalinir You can download and read it for free via this link.
We would be delighted to hear your feedback.
Wishing you happy reading.